Comments for Redonkulous Redundancy

Comment on Religion: Blight Upon Humanity? by Roulette-Müller

Roulette-Müller — Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:08:00 +0000

Great idea, but will this work over the long run?

Comment on Putting the Misconception to Bed: Why Atheism and Agnosticism are Not Mutually Exclusive by teens get drunk at party

teens get drunk at party — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:42:56 +0000

any updates coming ?

Comment on Religion: Blight Upon Humanity? by Challenge to faith. Is religion a Blight upon Humanity? | Civil Religion | STLtoday

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:35:21 +0000

[...] This question was posed on a blog a few months ago with the following note:blight n. – Something that impairs growth, withers hopes and ambitions, or impedes progress and prosperity. The question is simple – to paraphrase Bertrand Russell, is religion the dragon that needs slaying in order to facilitate the societal progress that will benefit all of humanity? [...]

Comment on Putting the Misconception to Bed: Why Atheism and Agnosticism are Not Mutually Exclusive by Alexwebmaster

Alexwebmaster — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:18:38 +0000

Hello webmaster
I would like to share with you a link to your site
write me here preonrelt@mail.ru

Comment on Religion: Blight Upon Humanity? by Kelly

Kelly — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:48:02 +0000

I just found this site, and LOVE it! I’m a 58-year-old Engl. Prof., and teach a section relating to perception and reality. I just read your other blog about atheism and agnosticism and loved it as well. You might want to check out http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html. Keep writing…you make my day.

Comment on Putting the Misconception to Bed: Why Atheism and Agnosticism are Not Mutually Exclusive by Kelly

Kelly — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:25:22 +0000

What a great essay–very clear and concise, and it includes humor! Nicely stated!

Comment on Putting the Misconception to Bed: Why Atheism and Agnosticism are Not Mutually Exclusive by Tommy Blanchard

Tommy Blanchard — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:42:00 +0000

Bill Maher, in a recent interview on The Daily Show, said he “doesn’t like the certainty of atheism”. I was pretty upset by this – you don’t have to be certain of anything to be an atheist! Any reasonable atheist would say that they would be willing to begin believing if there was sufficient evidence to warrant belief.

I found it really upsetting that Maher, who has a movie critical of religion coming out soon, contributed to the misunderstanding about what atheism is.

Comment on Carnival of the Liberals #73 by The Ridger

The Ridger — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:10:44 +0000

Sorry for the late comment, but thanks for the great job hosting this time!

Comment on The Evidence I Need by Dan

Dan — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:28:53 +0000

I don’t know. Why can’t god be a good answer?Naturalism seems to be out of one. And this isn’t the only argument for theism. I always saw it as a cumulative case

Comment on Carnival of the Liberals #73 by varkam

varkam — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:36:21 +0000

Truth Justice,

Couple of things.

First, I’m not a teacher. I have never purported to be a teacher, nor do I want to be a teacher. I have no idea where you got that from.

Second, I thought it was funny given this administration’s problem with FEMA and hurricanes, especially in light of Bush’s comment to then FEMA director Mike Brown (“You’re doing a heckuva job, Brownie”).

Third, I’m about as white as it gets, so…yeah.

Cheers,
varkam